我國花新台幣55億元,向美國購入2艘派里級巡防艦(Oliver Hazard Perry class frigate),預計明年初接鑑;同等級的船艦居然被美軍當靶船擊沉,似乎有點尷尬。美國戰略國際研究中心主任格洛瑟曼(Brad Glosserman)表示,「為什麼我們要賣垃圾給你們,讓你們變得更弱,我的意思是畢竟美國的利益牽涉其中,(賣爛武器)這種說法一點也說不通。」
Brad Glosserman is executive director of the Pacific Forum CSIS in Honolulu, an independent program of the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). The Pacific Forum has provided policy-oriented analysis and promoted dialogue on regional security, political, economic, and environmental issues in the Asia-Pacific region since 1975. Mr. Glosserman oversees all aspects of Pacific Forum activities, including conferences, fellowships, publications, and administration. He is coeditor of Comparative Connections, the Pacific Forum’s triannual journal and writes, along with Pacific Forum president Ralph Cossa, the regional review. He is also the coauthor, with Scott Synder, of The Japan-South Korea Identity Clash (Columbia University Press, 2015), a study of national identity in Japan and South Korea and its impact on U.S. alliances. He recently completed a three-year study with Pacific Forum director of programs Carl Baker on the future of U.S. alliances in Asia and is finalizing a study on the impact of the March 11, 2011, “triple catastrophe” on Japan.
Mr. Glosserman is the editor, with Tae-hyo Kim, of The Future of U.S.-Korea-Japan Relations: Balancing Values and Interests (CSIS, 2004). He is also the English-language editor of the journal of the New Asia Research Institute (NARI) in Seoul. His opinion pieces and commentary regularly appear in media around the globe, and he has written dozens of monographs on U.S. foreign policy and Asian security relations. Other articles have appeared in scholarly journals throughout the region, and he has contributed numerous chapters to books on regional security. He is a frequent participant in U.S. State Department visiting lecture programs and speaks at conferences, research institutes, and universities around the world. He is also an adjunct lecturer at the Management Center of Innsbruck (MCI). Prior to joining Pacific Forum, Mr. Glosserman was, for 10 years, a member of The Japan Times editorial board, and he continues to serve as a contributing editor for that newspaper. While in Japan, he also was a lecturer on Japanese politics at the Institute for the International Education of Students. Mr. Glosserman holds a J.D. from George Washington University, an M.A. from Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), and a B.A. from Reed College. 作者: wendencwu 時間: 2016-7-23 06:57 PM
F-16 是美國現役的戰斗機,但被改裝成為靶機的F-16 是已經退役,並且在美國亞歷山大桑那州機墳墓場里‘埋’了15年以上的老飛機 (The converted F-16, one of many that had been "mothballed" for 15 years at a site in Arizona)。 這種早期的 F-16 無論是性能或機体壽命都已經到了盡頭。 就好像是大家可以淘汰30年前生產的奔馳車,但還可以照樣去買奔馳新車。 雖然都是奔馳, 你覺的30年前生產的奔馳車跟今天生產的奔馳新車在性能上有可比性嗎? 作者: domeme 時間: 2016-7-24 01:47 AM
說無感是假的啦,美國也不可能拿最新銳的戰艦來當靶艦吧!當然會這樣做,也代表著這個載台已經屬於要被淘汰的級別了.但是,以目前台灣的經濟來看,省點花,買剛退役的良品是短時間的替代方案,未來應該著重在自製的新式戰艦才是.作者: harker633 時間: 2016-7-24 02:02 AM
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽作者: zaqwsxdsa 時間: 2016-7-24 02:36 AM
dunhill75927 發表於 2016-7-23 11:07 PM
想當年美國還拿航母當靶船
當初的航母就算放到現在的亞洲也是嚇嚇叫
老瓦是建造到一半國家瓦解...
所以沒能力繼續建造下去!!!
而不是服役了很久然後退役的船...作者: jerry20132013 時間: 2016-7-24 07:07 AM
本帖最後由 jerry20132013 於 2016-7-24 07:08 AM 編輯
dunhill75927 發表於 2016-7-23 11:07 PM
想當年美國還拿航母當靶船
當初的航母就算放到現在的亞洲也是嚇嚇叫
照你這麼講靶船不就一定威??
別偷換慨念,沒人說航母靶船沒用,派里有多威大家都知道 作者: dunhill75927 時間: 2016-7-24 11:21 AM
uskz 發表於 2016-7-24 12:49 AM
_航空母艦是一個特例。 當年美國當靶船的航母就是現在放在亞洲一樣嗷嗷叫, 因
為到目前為止全亞洲還沒有 ...
很簡單 因為派里級的聲納到現在為止都是美軍現役
派里級放在最外圍的其中一個目的就是反潛
懂嗎? 目前全亞洲 也沒做出更好的聲納系統 懂嗎?作者: dunhill75927 時間: 2016-7-24 11:22 AM
jerry20132013 發表於 2016-7-24 07:07 AM
照你這麼講靶船不就一定威??
別偷換慨念,沒人說航母靶船沒用,派里有多威大家都知道
...
這不是麵包超人嗎? 你知道派里級的聲納目前還是美軍現役嗎?
你不知道就是要買來抓中國潛艦? 那個聲納威翻了
你的臉又腫了作者: dunhill75927 時間: 2016-7-24 11:24 AM
zaqwsxdsa 發表於 2016-7-24 02:36 AM
老瓦是建造到一半國家瓦解...
所以沒能力繼續建造下去!!!
服役還有再保養 沒能力建造放在那有可能保養嗎?
作者: zaqwsxdsa 時間: 2016-7-24 11:43 AM
dunhill75927 發表於 2016-7-24 11:24 AM
服役還有再保養 沒能力建造放在那有可能保養嗎?
這是個好問題...
不過你覺得從新開始建造都不會把整艘船都檢視一遍後再開始???
就傻傻地繼續建造下去都不管之前的船體狀況???作者: uskz 時間: 2016-7-24 11:52 AM
dunhill75927 發表於 2016-7-24 11:21 AM
很簡單 因為派里級的聲納到現在為止都是美軍現役